JMIR Medical Informatics

Background Machine learning (ML) models are increasingly used to predict adverse outcomes after surgery. However, most rely on static patient characteristics (e.g., age, comorbidities) and overlook clinician-controlled treatment decisions that can be actively modified at the point of care. Discharge opioid prescribing is a key modifiable, clinician-controlled decision, yet optimizing prescribing choices across multiple adverse outcomes remains underexplored in predictive modeling. This study addresses that gap by introducing a novel ML framework that explicitly separates fixed patient risk factors from modifiable prescribing options to support personalized, risk-informed opioid prescribing decisions. Methods We developed the Hierarchical Clinical Fusion Transformer (HCF-Transformer), an ML model designed to estimate patient-specific risks across four postoperative outcomes: prolonged opioid use (POU), chronic pain (CP), 30-day readmission, and opioid-associated outcomes (OAO). The model constructs patient risk profiles from fixed, non-modifiable baseline factors, followed by a transformer layer. Clinician-controllable discharge opioid regimens are modeled as alternative intervention candidates and fused with the fixed risk representation through a clinical fusion mechanism, enabling assessment and ranking based on predicted risks. A Total Relative Risk (TRR) metric, calibrated to each outcome prediction threshold, guides the recommendation process. We evaluated the model in diabetic surgical patients, a common high-risk population. Results The study included 157,853 unique diabetic surgical patients, with outcome prevalences ranging from 47.2% (POU) to 1.8% (OAO). The HCF-Transformer achieved the highest AUROCs, 0.798 for POU, 0.712 for 30-day readmission, 0.808 for CP, and 0.922 for OAO, outperforming Random Forest, FT-Transformer, and ResNet-based models. Compared to these baselines, HCF-Transformer generated more stable and discriminative risk estimates and demonstrated significant variation in TRR scores across discharge opioid options (ANOVA p < .01, eta-squared > .01). This enabled consistent identification of lower-risk regimens tailored to patient-specific profiles. Conclusions The HCF-Transformer introduces a novel hierarchical fusion approach to optimize opioid prescribing by integrating static patient risk profiles with modifiable discharge options. Using transformer-based modeling and a quantifiable TRR metric, the model delivers personalized, risk-aware recommendations. This approach enables data-driven opioid prescribing tailored to individual risk and has the potential to improve postoperative outcomes in high-risk populations. Our findings demonstrate that integrating modifiable factors with structured risk profiles through a transformer-based fusion architecture can enhance decision-support systems, paving the way for more actionable and personalized AI in healthcare.

Background Electronic health record documentation patterns may reflect workflow complexity, monitoring intensity, and operational strain in intensive care settings. However, documentation-derived features can be sensitive to local documentation culture, data capture systems, and outcome definitions. Retrospective validation across multiple datasets is therefore needed before these signals are used in workflow intelligence or clinical AI governance tools. Objective To evaluate whether documentation-density and documentation-timing features show reproducible retrospective signal for ICU workflow complexity and long-stay proxy outcomes across de-identified critical care datasets, while distinguishing workflow and long-stay associations from unsupported claims about mortality prediction, burden reduction, or deployment readiness. Methods We synthesized retrospective validation results from de-identified ICU and workflow datasets generated through a prespecified documentation-density validation program. Feature families included Documentation Burden Score style features, Shift-End Documentation Rate style features, documentation reliability style metadata, and all-documentation feature sets where available. Outcomes included long ICU length of stay proxies, mortality where available, and workflow proxy endpoints. Models compared baseline feature sets with enhanced models containing documentation-density or workflow features. Performance was summarized using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, Brier score where reported, delta AUROC, bootstrap confidence intervals where reported, and label-shuffle controls where available. Results The strongest external long-stay proxy evidence came from the NWICU chartevents analysis, which included 28,612 ICU stays, 20,267 stays with chart events, and 9,619,759 chart events. For ICU length of stay greater than the median, baseline AUROC was 0.5252. Enhanced AUROC was 0.9512 for Documentation Burden Score features, 0.9214 for Shift-End Documentation Rate features, 0.8470 for documentation reliability style features, and 0.9517 for all documentation features. Corresponding label-shuffle enhanced AUROCs were near random, ranging from 0.4897 to 0.5064. For ICU length of stay greater than the 75th percentile, baseline AUROC was 0.5155. Enhanced AUROC was 0.9433 for Documentation Burden Score features, 0.9194 for Shift-End Documentation Rate features, 0.8118 for documentation reliability style features, and 0.9427 for all documentation features, with label-shuffle enhanced AUROCs from 0.4836 to 0.4999. Additional retrospective support was observed in eICU workflow analyses, HiRID first-24-hour documentation-density analyses, MIMIC-IV HF ICU internal analyses, MIMIC-IV-Note metadata extensions, and nursing-chart or lab density proxy analyses. However, cross-institution discrimination transfer was weak without recalibration, and several analyses remained proxy validations rather than final clinical validations. Conclusions Documentation-density and documentation-timing features show promising retrospective signal for ICU workflow complexity and long-stay proxy outcomes, especially in NWICU chartevents and selected internal dataset-specific analyses. These findings support further preregistered, prospective, silent-mode validation of documentation-derived workflow intelligence. They do not establish prospective clinical performance, mortality reduction, clinician burden reduction, autonomous deterioration prediction, or deployment readiness.

End-of-rotation handoffs are critical for patient safety but add to documentation burden for hospitalists. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) may help automate handoff creation using electronic health record data, but its impact on quality and safety is unclear. Methods: We developed an AI handoff tool with a large language model using clinical notes as input and conducted a retrospective evaluation comparing AI-generated and clinician-authored handoffs. Handoffs were assessed across domains of quality and safety through a structured review. Results: Quality ratings were similar between AI and human handoffs (3.7 vs. 3.5, p=0.57). AI-generated handoffs were rated higher for organization (4.4 vs. 4.1, p=0.05) and completeness (4.1 vs. 3.6, p=0.01), but lower for conciseness (3.7 vs. 4.1, p=0.03) and accuracy (4.1 vs. 4.4, p=0.03). Error rates were comparable (0.3/handoff in both groups); however, AI-generated handoffs included inaccuracies (9% of AI errors) and hallucinations (1% of AI errors), while clinician-authored handoffs contained only omissions. Conclusion: Human and AI handoffs have differing error profiles and tradeoffs between completeness and conciseness. Prospective evaluation in clinical workflows is underway.

Background: Medical registries have gained importance in the evaluation of healthcare quality outcomes. In the absence of high-quality evidence, such as randomized controlled trials, studies based on registry data are essential for informing clinical guidelines. Methods for assessing data quality are rarely described in detail. To ensure the credibility of registry-based studies, registries must use all available technical and operational means to guarantee high data quality. Method: Eurocrine(R) is a pan-European endocrine surgical database and quality registry initially funded by the EU healthcare programme, which started in 2015 and now includes more than 200,000 interventions as of April 2025. To ensure high data quality, interactive and standardized reports are created via Microsoft Power BI, which are created both centrally and locally. In addition, comprehensive data quality analyses were performed via the R-based package dataquieR. Results: Although a multitude of technical measures (for example, input screen design and real-time plausibility checks during data entry) are in place, they are not sufficient to prevent human errors at data entry. Errors identified in the reports were corrected, and preventive measures were implemented. Overall, the data quality was assessed as very good in terms of completeness, accuracy, and consistency. Conclusion: It is very important to provide registry users with an efficient and smart tool to identify data issues, as they have the clinical information to correct them. Data quality reports generated with dataquieR represent an effective tool for registry administrators. Predesigned Microsoft Power BI reports enable participating Eurocrine(R) clinics to self-audit their data.

Background Emergency department (ED) triage is a high-stakes clinical decision process that determines patient prioritization and resource allocation under time pressure. Large language models (LLMs) have recently been proposed as decision-support tools for triage, yet most evaluations rely on simulated scenarios or curated datasets. Evidence from real-world clinical environments remains limited. The objective of this project was to systematically evaluate the performance, calibration, and reproducibility of multiple contemporary large language models for Emergency Severity Index (ESI) classification and sectoral allocation (ED vs. urgent care practice, UCP) using a comprehensive real-world triage dataset. Material and Methods Retrospective cross-sectional benchmarking study conducted at a tertiary academic emergency ED in Germany with an integrated central point of assessment (CPA). The study included all consecutive adult walk-in encounters (>18 years) presenting between October 2023 and February 2024 (N = 16,107). Data were collected from a structured clinical decision support system capturing presenting complaints, vital signs, and triage decisions recorded by specialized nursing staff. Structured clinical variables routinely collected at triage, including presenting complaint categories (CEDIS-PCL), vital signs according to the ABCDE framework, and additional structured or free-text clinical information. Results The primary outcome was the agreement between LLM-predicted and nurse-assigned ESI levels measured using quadratic-weighted Cohen's k. Secondary outcomes included sectoral assignment agreement, misclassification patterns (over- and under-triage), calibration metrics, and output reproducibility. Quadratic-weighted k values ranged from 0.18 to 0.75 across models. Only a structured stepwise prompting strategy achieved substantial agreement (k_qw = 0.747), approaching reported human inter-rater reliability. Most models demonstrated moderate or lower agreement and systematic overconfidence, with expected calibration errors (ECE) based on verbalized confidence ranging from 0.099 to 0.355. Sectoral assignment agreement (i.e. ED vs. urgent care practice, UCP) was uniformly low (k < 0.30). Reproducibility testing revealed substantial variability in 23% of cases, indicating non-deterministic output behavior for clinically relevant decisions. Conclusions Current large language models demonstrate heterogeneous and generally limited performance in real-world emergency triage tasks. Structured algorithm-guided prompting appears more influential than model architecture or size. Before clinical implementation, improvements in calibration, reliability, and workflow integration are required, alongside regulatory-compliant validation in prospective clinical settings.

Objective: Clinical phenotyping methods that rely on clinical and informatics expertise can be time-intensive and costly. We tested both manual and highly automated approaches using electronic health record (EHR) data to identify an FDA Sentinel Initiative health outcome of interest, acute pancreatitis. Materials and Methods: We trained and evaluated machine learning algorithms using EHR data with two approaches: a custom approach that included manually curated features and trained on outcomes data validated with medical record review, and a highly automated approach that greatly simplifies and automates feature engineering and relies on low-cost silver-standard outcomes for model training. Results: Custom algorithms using manually curated structured claims data discriminated cases from non-cases with a high degree of accuracy (cv-AUC 0.89 [95%CI 0.84-0.94]); the inclusion of natural language processing (NLP)-derived covariates from clinical notes increased performance slightly (cv-AUC 0.91[95%CI 0.86-0.97]). The automated algorithm trained on the outcome count of diagnosis codes performed less well (AUC 0.80 [95% CI 0.75-0.85]) but improved using maximum lipase value as an outcome (AUC 0.88 [95% CI 0.84-0.92]). At a positive predictive value of 90%, the custom algorithm had a sensitivity of 92%, the automated algorithm trained on diagnosis code count had a sensitivity of 45%, and the automated algorithm trained on maximum lipase value had a sensitivity of 84%. However, a prediction rule derived by clinicians during chart review was nearly as accurate (maximum lipase value [&ge;] 3 times upper limit of normal; AUC 0.86, PPV 85%, sensitivity 92%). Discussion: Machine learning algorithms with manually curated structured data and NLP features trained on validated outcomes data successfully identified validated events. Use of an outcome in the automated model based on specific phenotype knowledge (maximum lipase value) allowed for performance similar to the custom model and with considerably less resources.

Background: Statins are key to preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular events. However, skepticism regarding their safety and value persists and is increasingly influenced by social media. TikTok has emerged as a major source of health information, but its content varies in quality and accuracy. This study evaluated the quality, attitudes, misinformation, and engagement of statin-related content on TikTok. Methods: Public TikTok videos were collected using predefined search terms and coded by creator type, thematic content, and overall attitude. Video quality was assessed using the DISCERN instrument, the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials, and the Global Quality Score. False or misleading claims were independently reviewed by two cardiology fellows. Associations between engagement and quality were also examined. Results: Of 1,349 screened videos, 258 met inclusion criteria. Most were educational (91.0%), with non-physician healthcare providers (34.5%) as the largest creator group. Risks or negative effects were discussed more often than benefits (63.2% vs 42.2%), and 39.5% contained at least one false or misleading claim, most often from complementary and alternative medicine providers and wellness promoters. Quality differed by creator type across all instruments, with physician-created content scoring highest. Video popularity showed minimal association with informational quality. Conclusion: Statin-related TikTok content frequently emphasizes harms, often contains misinformation, and varies substantially in quality by creator type. Greater involvement of healthcare professionals on social media may help improve digital health literacy and counter misleading information about statin therapy.

Background: Electrolyte replacement is ubiquitous in the acute care setting, but its familiarity cannot belie that even small dosing errors with potassium can cause lethal cardiac arrhythmias. Recently, MedAgentBench offered a benchmark for agentic artificial intelligence (AI) including the ability to correctly dose potassium based on a single rule; however, this does not adequately reflect the clinical complexity or safety concerns of an agent that has been used as the lethal injection. The purpose of this analysis was to a probe leaderboard large language model (LLM) capabilities to follow basic dosing rules to safely replace potassium in a series of clinician-annotated cases. Methods: Using a clinician panel, we developed a series of dosing principles and 20 clinical cases reflective of the complexity of potassium replacement. External clinicians were surveyed to assess practice variability and agreement to clinician panel answers. We tested GPT-5-chat with each case in triplicate, with and without the clinician curated dosing principles, and prompted the model to answer six questions involving potassium goals, dosing, route, lab frequency, concurrent interventions, and the model's perceived level of confidence for the output and complexity of the case. The primary outcome was the rate of appropriate recommendations in comparison to clinician answers. Results: A total of 54 clinicians reviewed the 20 hypokalemia cases and hypokalemia dosing guideline. Clinicians expressed "highly agree" or "somewhat agree" for 66.8% of the cases evaluated when asked if they agree with the guideline-recommended management. When given the potassium dosing guideline, total errors dropped from 165 to 104, and average accuracy improved from 45% to 65% with GPT-5-Chat. GPT-5-Chat conveyed a high level of confidence for 100% of responses, while labeling 80% and 76% of cases as highly complex with and without the criteria, respectively. Potential harm scores were considerable in both groups, however, a notable reduction in severity scores occurred with the dosing guidance document. Recommendations on concurrent interventions and dosing had the highest rate of errors in both groups. Conclusions: Benchmarks must appropriately reflect clinical complexity to be considered valuable for the deployment of agentic artificial intelligence tools in the healthcare domain. GPT-5-Chat assessment on a comprehensive medication management task for potassium replacement showed improvement with dosing guidance, yet unfit benchmarking performance.

Objectives: Study design indexing of biomedical publications is crucial for evidence retrieval and synthesis. We sought to evaluate the accuracy and suitability of a transformer-based model (TM) for indexing clinical study designs, in comparison to National Library of Medicine (NLM) indexing. However, this is challenging for at least three reasons: First, to date, all automated systems have been trained and evaluated on manual NLM indexing assignments, itself subject to errors. Second, TM's probabilistic predictive scores take into account uncertainty, and can be converted to TRUE/FALSE assignments in different ways depending on the needs of users, while NLM labels are categorical. Third, our goal (to tag articles only that exhibit a given design) differs from NLM which tags articles that both discuss as well as exhibit that design. Materials and Methods: Therefore, we carried out a limited evaluation of the TM model that focuses only on the articles that received the most confident predictions, that is, the highest scores that are almost certainly TRUE and the lowest scores that are almost certainly FALSE, but which disagreed with NLM assignments. This was performed both for articles published in 2016 (when NLM decisions were manual) and in 2025 (when NLM decisions were automated). To establish ground truth, dual annotators indexed the articles independently, following written definitions, for four prominent study designs--cohort, case-control, cross-sectional, and case report. Results: For three designs (case-control, case report, cross-sectional), the articles having the top 100 predictive TM scores (when NLM failed to assign that design) were judged to exhibit that design in the great majority (86-100%) of cases. Conversely, the articles having the lowest 100 predictive TM scores (when NLM did assign the study design) exhibited the design only in relatively few (0-21%) of cases. The most confident predictions of the TM model were highly accurate and not redundant with automated NLM indexing; the exception was cohort studies articles, in which both TM and NLM labels showed high error rates of both omission and commission. Discussion and Conclusion: TM may have value for identifying articles exhibiting study designs, which is especially important for clinical decision-making as well as systematic reviews and other evidence syntheses. NLM indexing of cohort studies cannot be regarded as a reliable gold standard for training or evaluation of automated systems, warranting efforts to create a new manually annotated corpus.

Background: Machine learning models trained on population health surveys offer scalable tools for cardiovascular screening, but recurring methodological weaknesses undermine their credibility and equity: data leakage from synthetic oversampling, qualitative rather than quantitative explainability evaluation, and the absence of demographic fairness auditing at the clinical operating threshold. Methods: We present EXHEART, a leakage-free stacked ensemble pipeline trained on BRFSS 2015 (n = 253,680) and validated on BRFSS 2020 (n = 319,795; temporal transport and retrain) and a clinical cardiovascular examination dataset (n = 68,730). The pipeline combines XGBoost, LightGBM, Random Forest, and a multi-layer perceptron as base learners with 5-fold out-of-fold logistic regression stacking and Platt scaling calibration. A quantitative SHAP-LIME consistency framework, based on Kendall-tau rank correlation and Jaccard overlap, accompanies a decision-curve analysis, a subgroup-stratified SHAP interaction analysis, and an intersectional fairness audit (Sex x Age x Income) with threshold-shifting mitigation and a frontier of the fairness-utility trade-off. The framework also adds cross-instrument fairness-disparity attribution, an empirical diagnostic that provides evidence on whether an observed subgroup disparity is more consistent with a measurement-induced or a substantive explanation by re-validating it on a dataset that measures the same clinical construct objectively. On heart disease, this diagnostic associates 89% of the sex TPR gap (95% CI [0.65, 0.99]) with the self-reported survey outcome rather than with a substantive risk difference. Results: On BRFSS 2015, EXHEART achieves AUC-ROC = 0.850, AUPRC = 0.371, Brier score = 0.071, and reduces ECE by 96% (0.256 to 0.011) via Platt scaling. Global SHAP-LIME rank agreement is moderate-to-strong (Kendall-tau = 0.580, Spearman-rho = 0.818) with a substantial top-3 divergence (Jaccard@3 = 0.200), where Stroke flips from SHAP rank 8 to LIME rank 1. The Sex TPR gap is 0.124 at the screening threshold; intersectional Sex x Age disparities reach 0.649 among adequately-powered cells, 5.2x the single-attribute gap. Temporal transport to BRFSS 2020 collapses sensitivity from 0.776 to 0.267, while retraining restores AUC = 0.840 and ECE = 0.012. On clinical examination data, the Sex TPR gap collapses to 0.014; the attribution test indicates this gap is instrument-dependent, consistent with a measurement or outcome-definition explanation rather than a substantive risk difference. Cross-domain SHAP analysis identifies four instrument-independent CVD risk factors and two major portability failures. Conclusions: EXHEART combines three practices that population-scale cardiovascular classifiers usually apply in isolation: leakage-free training with calibrated probabilities, a test of whether the model's explanations are stable, and a fairness audit that examines intersecting subgroups rather than single attributes. Bringing them together proved worthwhile. The intersectional audit revealed disparities that single-attribute auditing missed, and the cross-instrument comparison indicated that much of the sex gap reflects how the outcome is measured in survey data rather than a substantive difference in risk. The temporal transport findings indicate that deployed BRFSS models warrant periodic monitoring and retraining to maintain clinical utility. EXHEART is a retrospective methodological evaluation on public de-identified data; it is not validated for direct clinical decision-making, diagnosis, or treatment recommendation without prospective clinical validation.

Objective: To evaluate whether a locally hosted open-weight large language model (LLM) can extract documented psychosocial factors from pediatric psychiatric intake notes and apply validated extraction to a large emergency psychiatry cohort. Materials and Methods: We identified emergency department presentations at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2024, among patients younger than 18 years with psychiatric billing diagnoses. Using full-text intake notes, gpt-oss:120b classified peer conflict, sleep disruption, and school-related academic, attendance, and disciplinary issues as detected, negated, or indeterminate. Four human raters independently reviewed 50 notes. We compared Fleiss' kappa among humans alone versus humans plus the LLM, assessed repeated-query stability across 50 independent calls per note, and applied the workflow to all eligible notes. Results: Among 37,315 eligible admissions, 22,284 had eligible intake notes; 22,270 produced parseable JSON. In detected-versus-not-detected coding, human-plus-LLM reliability did not differ significantly from human-only reliability across measures (human {kappa} 0.71-0.94; human-plus-LLM {kappa} 0.70-0.93). Stability was associated with human agreement: mean LLM-human agreement increased from 42.6% for classifications with less than 80% stability to 82.7% for classifications with 100% stability (Pearson r = 0.36). Full-cohort extraction showed frequent and overlapping documented factors: sleep disruption was most frequently detected (57.7%), followed by peer conflict (47.2%), academic issues (43.4%), disciplinary issues (43.3%), and attendance issues (16.9%). Discussion: Agreement varied by construct and was strongest when repeated model outputs were stable. Conclusion: Locally hosted open-weight LLMs can support scalable structured extraction of documented psychosocial factors from pediatric psychiatric intake notes after local validation.

Skin cancer requires early detection for improved survival rates. Most existing methods rely on deep learning based image classification, which is affected by visual similarity among lesions. Fewer studies use Gene Expression (GE) analysis, which captures molecular characteristics but lacks structural and visual details. To overcome limitations of individual modalities, this paper proposes a multimodal framework integrating dermoscopic images and GE profiles for skin cancer classification. EfficientNet and logistic regression are used for image based analysis and genomic skin lesion profiling, respectively, followed by fuzzy rule based decision systems to reduce uncertainty within individual modalities. Finally, fuzzy fusion combines predictions from both modalities using uncertainty based weighting of classifier outputs. The experimental findings show that both the image based and GE based classification models individually achieved accuracies of nearly 92%. However, the integration of prediction results through the proposed fuzzy fusion strategy further enhanced the classification performance, achieving an overall accuracy of 94.25%. The results obtained outperform contemporary methods, highlighting the effectiveness of combining complementary multimodal information compared with single modality approaches.

Abstract Background: Kaposi sarcoma (KS) is the most common cancer among men in several Eastern African countries, yet treatment monitoring relies on imprecise, time-consuming ruler-based measurements defined by the AIDS Clinical Trial Group (ACTG). This method suffers from inter-observer variability, fails to capture lesion height or true geometric area, and performs poorly on dark skin. SkinScan3D (SS3D) is a portable, low-cost, AI-enabled 3D imaging device that provides objective measurements of KS skin lesion area, height, volume, and color. The Precision Imaging to Evaluate Kaposi Sarcoma (PRIME-KS) study evaluates whether SS3D provides more reproducible and accurate lesion measurements than the standard method, and validates its integration into routine clinical workflows in Kenya and Uganda. Methods: PRIME-KS is a multicountry prospective mixed-methods study with two clinical objectives. Objective 1 is a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study comparing SS3D with ruler-based measurement in 50 adults with KS (150 lesions) across sites in Kenya and Uganda. Two clinicians independently measure three lesions per participant using both methods. The primary outcomes are concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) for inter-rater reproducibility, and co-efficient of determination for accuracy. Objective 2 is a non-randomized before-and-after pilot study in 100 patients at three sites, evaluating device usability, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility using validated instruments, along with time-and-motion studies and activity-based micro-costing. Prior to these clinical objectives, a formative study used focus group discussions, discrete choice experiments, and human-centered design workshops to refine the SS3D device and protocols with end-user input. Discussion: PRIME-KS will provide the first rigorous evaluation of a 3D imaging device for monitoring KS treatment response in routine clinical settings. If SS3D demonstrates superior reproducibility and clinical utility, it could reduce unnecessary chemotherapy exposure and associated toxicities by enabling earlier, more objective assessment of treatment response. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06898203, registered 27 March 2025. Pan African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR202603523439856. Keywords Kaposi sarcoma, SkinScan3D, 3D imaging, treatment monitoring, diagnostic accuracy, implementation science, usability, human-centered design, Kenya, Uganda

Background: Molecular medicine has made genetic diagnostics crucial for rare diseases, but the majority of patients remains without diagnosis even after state-of-the-art assessment. Standardized systems for integrating clinical features, such as the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO), offer assistance, but are often insufficiently detailed and fail to capture crucial clinical parameters such as age at onset, longitudinal changes in symptoms, detailed characteristics of a clinical symptom, or the absence of a feature. Results: We present Genosolver an integrated workflow that utilizes machine learning to address this bottleneck. Using Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) on unstructured clinical notes and electronic health care data, we generate a workflow that unifies phenotype extraction, generates differential diagnosis, and prioritizes genetic variants from genome data. We evaluated the performance on 233 previously genetically solved cases, where Genosolver ranked the causative gene first in 72% of cases and in 94% of cases in the top 10 gene list, outperforming the existing benchmarking tool Exomiser by 9%. Semi-automated reanalysis of 1,875 unsolved rare disease cases yielded an additional diagnostic rate of 1.7%. Incorporating rich, unstandardized clinical narratives substantially enhanced model performance beyond HPO-only inputs and demonstrated competitive results using data security compliant local models. Conclusion: Integrating unstandardized clinical data with local LLMs and reasoning offers a scalable, data-secure workflow that increases molecular diagnoses in rare diseases.

Background. Capillary refill time, an examiner-dependent bedside test of distal microvascular perfusion, has become a resuscitation target in septic shock,1,2,3,4 motivating a continuous surrogate computed from the photoplethysmogram (PPG, the optical waveform the pulse oximeter on every ICU patient already records).5,6,7,8 Objective. We attempted three PPG-derived candidate measures on the MIMIC-IV Waveform Database (MIMIC-IV-WDB v0.1.0) and asked, by inspecting randomly drawn examples, whether each captured its intended physiology before any downstream modeling. Methods. MIMIC-IV-WDB v0.1.09 was linked to MIMIC-IV.10 The signals were a cuff-anchored perfusion-index recovery (reactive hyperemia when the cuff shares an arm with the probe), a slow Mayer-wave-band power ratio of the perfusion index (sympathetic vasomotor tone), and a per-beat diastolic exponential decay time constant (a refill-like recovery time). For each signal we drew 10 random examples at a fixed seed and checked them against a checklist fixed in advance. Each was read by the author and, separately, by MedGemma 1.5, a multimodal medical language model run locally. A synthetic test with a known time constant checked the third signal. Results. The cuff-anchored signal showed the expected occlusion-reperfusion shape on 268 of 6,236 evaluable cuff cycles (4.30%) in 15 of 19 patients, consistent with opposite-limb placement of the probe and cuff. The slow-band ratio returned a stable cohort value, but a clear, stationary peak appeared in only4 of 10 random windows. The per-beat fit met its goodness-of-fit threshold in 10 of 10 beats, yet a cardiac-frequency heuristic flagged a possible fit on the heart-rate oscillation in 7 of 10, and in 5 of 17 patients the time constant lay where an exponential is indistinguishable from a straight line. A 0.5Hz high-pass pre-filter implanted its own approximately 318 ms time constant regardless of truth. The language model tracked the human on clear positives but reported the pattern present on every call it returned, never absent. Conclusions. Two of the three candidate signals did not reflect their intended physiology in most examples, and the third was constrained by sensor placement. Inspecting a few random raw inputs against a checklist written in advance is an inexpensive upstream check before downstream inference on PPG-derived microvascular signals.

Background: Safe reuse of multimodal hospital data for AI development is limited by the absence of reliable, context-aware deidentification across multimodal data and longitudinal patient data. Existing approaches are largely modality-specific and can indiscriminately remove clinically important information. Methods: We developed the Multimodal Anonymizer, a modular, locally deployable multi-agent framework integrating multimodal large language models, task-specific neural networks and rule-based transformations. We evaluated 16 orchestrator model configurations on a benchmark built from publicly available data and hospital data from our institution. The benchmark dataset included data from different origins: 250 MIMIC-IV patients with synthetically injected personally identifiable information (PII) supplemented with head CT, face images, handwriting, audio, German clinical-text datasets and local data. Primary outcomes were deidentification sensitivity and preservation of clinically important content; secondary analyses examined model characteristics, reproducibility, and performance against leading market and open-source solutions. Results: The best local configuration (the orchestrator being Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Thinking) achieved near-complete deidentification across all datasets, with per-patient sensitivity of 98.80% (95%-CI 97.20; 100), and per-PII sensitivity of 99.82% (95%-CI 99.76; 99.88). Critical clinical preservation was 99.60% (95%-CI 98.80; 100) per-patient, and clinical preservation was 99.61% (95%-CI 99.51; 99.71) per-file. All modalities achieved at least 98.30% sensitivity (lower bound 95%-CI). On our local data, the system achieved a deidentification sensitivity of 100% per-patient and per-PII; and a critical clinical preservation of 100% per-patient as well as a clinical preservation of 99.97% (95%-CI 99.91; 100) per-file. When comparing orchestrators, the leading local models were similar to proprietary models (GPT-5.2) in deidentification sensitivity while showing higher deidentification specificity. The Multimodal Anonymizer outperformed previous tools on most modalities. Conclusion: Near-complete, utility-preserving deidentification of multimodal clinical data is achievable with a unified, locally deployable multi-agent system, enabling safer large-scale reuse of hospital data for research and AI development.

Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a transformative technology across biomedical and life science sectors, with applications spanning drug discovery, medical imaging, genomics, and clinical decision support (Goecks et al., 2020; Patel et al., 2020). Despite exponential growth in ML-related publications, from fewer than 100 articles in 2003 to nearly 25,000 by 2021 (NCBI, 2022), adoption among industry professionals remains uneven and sector-dependent. Understanding what drives or inhibits this adoption is critical for organisations seeking to leverage ML capabilities in research and clinical practice. Technology adoption in organisational contexts has been extensively studied through the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), originally proposed by Davis (1989) and subsequently extended to incorporate external variables influencing perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEU) (Venkatesh & Davis, 1996). While TAM has been applied across multiple industries, its application within biomedical and life science contexts remains limited, and the industry-specific factors that shape ML acceptance in this sector have not been systematically examined. Two external variables are particularly relevant to life science professionals. First, the bibliometric journal impact factor (JIF) functions as a cognitive signal of scientific credibility, a sector where evidence-based decision-making is culturally embedded, and publication quality serves as a proxy for technological legitimacy (Garfield, 1996). Second, technology hype, operationalised through the Gartner Hype Cycle framework, represents a social influence variable that shapes organisational expectations and investment decisions around emerging technologies (Gartner Inc., 2018). Whether these variables influence ML acceptance among life science professionals, alongside individual knowledge and experience, has not been empirically tested. This study addresses that gap by investigating ML technology acceptance among 213 biomedical and life science professionals across EMEA, LATAM, and North America, using a cross-sectional quantitative survey and PLS-SEM analysis. The TAM model is extended with three external variables, JIF, technology hype, and prior knowledge and experience, to test their influence on PU and PEU in this specific professional context. Additionally, the study examines demographic and regional differences in ML acceptance, with particular attention to variation between academic researchers and healthcare professionals. The findings contribute a validated, sector-specific extension of TAM for life sciences, provide actionable insights for organisations seeking to accelerate ML implementation, and establish a framework for future subsector-specific research.

Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) is a progressive valvular disease associated with poor prognosis once symptoms develop, yet routine echocardiographic screening is impractical. While artificial intelligence (AI)-based electrocardiogram (ECG) models have shown promise for AS detection, it remains unclear whether they primarily reflect conventional left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) voltage criteria or capture additional ECG features. Methods and Results: We developed a deep learning model using 244,816 ECGs from 51,713 patients across six academic institutions in Japan (CLIDAS database). AS labels were derived from inpatient Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) codes. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.849 (95% confidence interval 0.832-0.865) in the independent test cohort, with consistent performance across institutions, sex, and age. At a threshold of 0.1, sensitivity was 79.1%, specificity was 73.9%, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 98.0%. Conventional LVH voltage criteria (Sokolow-Lyon AUC 0.706; Cornell AUC 0.692) showed lower performance, and adding them to the AI model conferred no incremental benefit (AUC 0.849 vs. 0.847). Gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) revealed predominant attention around QRS complexes in limb leads, beyond regions typically assessed in LVH evaluation. Conclusions: This multicenter AI-ECG model demonstrated strong discrimination for AS and captured ECG features beyond conventional LVH voltage criteria. The high NPV supports its use as a rule-out pre-screening tool.

Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT are rapidly reshaping healthcare education and simulation-based training in non-technical skills (NTS), yet no bibliometric analysis has mapped this landscape. We searched seven open-access databases (OpenAlex, PubMed, Europe PMC, Crossref, Semantic Scholar, CORE, DOAJ) for English-language publications from January 2020 to March 2026. From 100,277 initial records, a sequential keyword funnel yielded 830 candidate papers, which were screened by 83 independent Claude Sonnet 4.6 AI agents applying pre-specified inclusion criteria (PRISMA-trAIce compliant; Cohen's kappa = 0.86 pre-reconciliation, 1.0 post-reconciliation). The final AI-verified corpus comprised 551 papers with a compound annual growth rate of 109%, contributions from 2,398 authors across 279 journals in 58 countries, and an h-index of 41. ChatGPT dominated the model landscape (46% of papers), with open-source models virtually absent. Virtual patient chatbots were the leading simulation modality (106 papers). Among NTS domains, communication (145 papers) and decision-making (135 papers) were most studied, whereas teamwork, leadership, situational awareness, and crisis resource management were markedly underrepresented. Only 6 urology-relevant papers were identified, none examining LLM integration within boot camp training formats. The field is growing at extraordinary pace but remains concentrated in a narrow range of NTS domains and a single proprietary model. Critical gaps persist in team-based skills training, open-source model evaluation, and specialty-specific simulation. AI-assisted bibliometric screening using multiple independent agents is feasible, reliable, and scalable, offering a replicable methodology for mapping fast-evolving research fields.

Objective: Several endotypes contribute to the development of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). However, efforts to measure these endotypes have been challenging. In this paper, we propose a new method that overcomes some of these challenges. Methods: To test the feasibility of this new method, data from the Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) were analyzed and two oxygen-based endotypes were identified and plotted on a graphical model: the steady-state SpO2 and the SpO2 arousal threshold. The first is the oxygen saturation that would occur during sleep if there were no arousals, and it is a measure of upper airway collapsibility (a more collapsible airway produces a lower SpO2). The latter is the oxygen saturation that triggers arousals. These endotypes were validated by assessing their ability to detect positional and state-related changes in airway collapsibility and arousal threshold. Results: The study showed that it was feasible to measure oxygen-based endotypes in 95% of SHHS participants. As expected, steady-state SpO2 was lower during supine vs. non-supine sleep, as well as during REM vs. NREM sleep. Also, the SpO2 arousal threshold was similar between supine and non-supine sleep. However, SpO2 arousal threshold was not lower in REM sleep vs. NREM sleep. Therefore, in 3 of the 4 conditions, the oxygen-based endotypes moved in the expected direction due to positional or sleep state changes. Conclusion: Although further validation experiments are required, this study indicates that OSA endotyping using the pulse oximetry signal is feasible. The oxygen-based endotypes could be used to aid therapeutic decision making.